![]() No, even non-Congress governments did not pick it up. The courts repeatedly interfered and quashed various matters, the CBI didn’t take it forward, nobody else did either.Įven subsequent governments didn’t pick it up? The investigation was completed, it was the prosecution that was stalled. If Quattrocchi was not an agent in this deal, why was he paid? It was absolutely clear that bribes had been paid, that Ottavio Quattrocchi was paid, as was established by Swiss bank documents in connection with the deal. In the Bofors case, the courts unfortunately interfered with the investigations repeatedly, and then when the Congress government came back, it also interfered, like in the Madhavsinh Solanki case, and after some time I also got fatigued with the matter and didn’t bother to pursue it. I’ve been dealing with corruption for a long time, the first time may have been the Bofors scam in the early 90s. People have been coming to me for a long time…all these public interest cases have been generated by people who have the relevant information. I’ve been involved with public interest cases and issues, particularly corruption cases in high places, for years and perhaps people believe here’s a person who is doing something about it, taking them to court and the like. You have become the point person for whistleblowers from the bureaucracy, police and even the media. However, I did not bother to ask him his name or identity. ![]() It was obviously someone from the organisation which was responsible for putting the guards at Sinha’s residence who gave me the diary…a whistleblower. How did the visitor’s book fall into your hands? It has to do with the integrity of the main anti-corruption investigating agency and, therefore, it’s essential Sinha be brought to book. Here is a CBI director who seems to be surreptitiously and unofficially meeting a number of high-profile accused persons who are being investigated by the agency, even as he’s dealing with their investigation files. I’m glad the courts are taking this forward, because the issue is very serious. ![]() Bhushan, however, admits he now needs a larger network of people to help in unearthing, scrutinising and probing scandals, and is all set to launch a new organisation for whistleblowers.Īre you satisfied with the court’s indictment of Ranjit Sinha? Bhushan has moved on to form the Swaraj Abhiyan, a new political movement that hopes to bring ideology into everyday politics, even as he continues to push the judiciary to hound the corrupt and is at the forefront exposing a string of scandals, such as the Reliance gas scam, the Essar tapes and emails scam, 2G spectrum scandal and the Vyapam scam. He has skilfully and doggedly used the public interest litigation (PIL) route to dig out and pursue cases of corruption, civil liberties and human rights.īhushan exploded on the political scene as one of the prominent members of the headline-grabbing India Against Corruption, along with Anna Hazare and Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, but the movement went up in smoke after his very public fight with Kejriwal over the future course of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). Over the years, Bhushan has become the point person for whistleblowers from the bureaucracy, police and even the media. The court’s observation was based on a visitor’s diary submitted by Bhushan that showed Sinha had compromised investigations into the scam by meeting the accused at his residence over 50-60 times, as records reveal. ![]() Celebrated lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan has just notched up another victory with the Supreme Court-appointed panel decreeing there was prima facie evidence that former CBI director Ranjit Sinha had attempted to influence the investigation into the coal block allocation scam under the then UPA government.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |